Love Doll Loli

(58 People Likes) Why do people complain that wealthy people just “sit on their money” when it’s in a bank? Don’t the banks loan out most of that money and put it back into the economy? Am I wrong?

Capital Advantage Slowed the recovery from the 2008 housing crisis and most insidiously Wealthy sit on their money leading more wealthy people to sit on their money by first discussing how they increased their holdings in the first place. AFTER THE FINANCIAL CRISIS OF 2008, THE FED S Love Doll Loli SIMULATE ECONOMIC ACTIVITY – THE PROBLEM WAS NO ONE SPENT IT On the surface, that might seem like a good thing. But it is not. The Fed has a tricky job – I’ve heard it compared to driving the Titanic and looking in the rearview mirror. The leverage they have is very indirect and if they inject too much money they would create inflation just as destructive as a recession. Quantitative easing keeps interest rates low – which is great – when you borrow money[1]… The problem was that the banks didn’t lend. Credit fuels a healthy economy. And if banks allocate credit fairly — which includes taking increased risks with small businesses, first-time homeowners, and equipment finance — the benefits of Fed intervention would have been spread more evenly across the economy dealt with the ECB, the same basic mechanisms worked in the US. “QE mostly benefits the rich,” admits JPMorgan, listing 8 ways ECB QE will hurt everyone else SIMPLY THE 2008 FINANCIAL CRISIS TOOK MONEY FROM THE 99% AND REDISTRIBUTED IT TO THE TOP 1%[2]
HOW DOES ALL THIS RELATE TO THE QUESTION OF EXPENSES? By and large, much of the top 1%’s recent wealth gains have not come from productivity gains, job creation, or any contribution to overall wealth. Together, they got richer by rigging the game — also known as rent-seeking behavior (increasing one’s share of existing wealth without creating new wealth). As part of the population, the richest 1% unilaterally appropriated additional money from the 99%. …and they have no intention of returning it.[3][4]

“Fiscal policy” (the Federal Reserve stimulating the banking system) is not enough to combat a financial crisis[5]s without inflationary “public policy” – which is very effective[6] (Public policy would have required federal and state governments to contribute significantly to deficit spending. Unfortunately, conservatives often focus on an imaginary “debt problem” — knowing that citizens would mistake the federal deficit for a footnote
[1] Page not found
[2] http://eml.berkeley.edu//~saez/saez-UStopincomes-2012.pdf
[3] https://files.stlouisfed.org/files/htdocs/publications/review/87/03/Changes_Mar1987.pdf
[4] GDP, wealth, wealth effect and marginal propensity to consume
[5] 81.5%

(89 People Likes) If the new sex dolls are so realistic, can they give you the smack?

In the book, a ship’s agent talks about another ship’s captain with a rubber doll (not a robot) that he kept hidden in his cabin so he wouldn’t be unfaithful to his wife. One day the captain feels ill and goes to see a doctor. The doctor says he has a sexually transmitted disease. The captain says NO WAY and explains. But remember, hello

(97 Likes) I’m 18 and I have a job. Is it okay if I still like dolls? It feels childish but I really like her.

I have some collectible Barbies and quite a bit of china, many of which are costumed as characters from my books, but my favorites are my Asian ball jointed dolls, many of which are also costumed as characters from my books. Try stopping by and joining us here: Dollieh Sanctuary There are MANY of us who are much older than you. Even a few moms with teenage daughters who both love each other